Information on suing for slander

A claim for slander differs from a libel claim in one primary respect; when suing for slander the claimant alleges that a defamatory statement was spoken, rather than written down. This distinguishing point between slander and libel may not seem like a major distinction, but when it comes to trial the difference becomes much clearer.

For example, in the recent case of Hussein v Farooq, the claimant alleged that the defendants had disparaged his professional merit in front of a potential client and by doing so they had damaged his reputation. However during the time that the statement was made the claimant was not present, and only brought the lawsuit based on the information he received from his assistant. The court was unable to conclude that the defamatory statement was ever made, and therefore found for the defendant.

The lack of concrete evidence and the need to rely on witnesses make suing for slander much more complex than a claim for libel. Additionally, in both cases the claimant must prove that the statement was indeed defamatory.

If you feel that someone has made a defamatory statement against you and you are thinking of suing for slander, you should first discuss the merits of your case with a solicitor. Proving defamation is difficult and legal proceedings are more complex and expensive in this area of tort than in most other civil lawsuits. Seeking professional advice will therefore allow you evaluate your case before making a financial commitment.

If you would like to obtain legal advice on slander matters, Contact Law can put you in touch with a local civil litigation / slander solicitor free of charge. So, if you have any questions or would like our help in finding local civil litigation / slander solicitors please call us on 0800 1777 162 or complete the web-form above.