Divorce proceedings: are formulas "family-friendly"?

 

Divorce proceedings will become cheaper and more consistent, according to senior members of the judiciary.

Canadian-style "cookie-cutter" justice could soon become a permanent fixture through reforms being proposed by the Law Commission.

Import of Canadian divorce law

The Matrimonial Property, Needs and Agreements Consultation looks set to incorporate the Canadian Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines.

Under the changes, the amounts that divorcing couples can expect to receive will be calculated by a mathematical formula that considers factors such as the length of a marriage and the number of children.

Judges will be able to vary pay-outs. However, for the most part, the new formula will set upper and lower guide limits for settlements. For childless couples, the length of the marriage and income differential will decide the settlement and the duration of post-divorce support.

The aim of the reforms is to increase consistency in divorce judgments - providing couples with clarity regarding their entitlement if they decide to part ways and reducing the cost of divorce by deterring unrealistic claims.

"Cookie-cutter" justice

Critics of the system, introduced in Canada in 2008, argue that it is "cookie-cutter" justice in which divorce settlements are too rigid, rather than based on the merits of each case.

"A one-size-fits-all approach creates a big risk that fairness in individual cases won't be maintained," said Jonathan West, head of family law at Prolegal.

Whilst cost reduction is a worthwhile cause, West views higher costs as the trade-off for securing justice: "...to look at cases in a bespoke way may cost more than the 'cookie-cutter' model but, if we're committed to maintaining the highest standards of justice and fairness...there's no substitute."

However, West does concede that the current system is in need of reform and points to the problematic use of 'joint life orders,' in which one spouse is required to pay maintenance to the other for a period of time significantly longer than the marriage. "The current system discourages the poorer spouse from remarrying because doing so would jeopardise their income," claimed West.

In defence of the new guidelines, their supporters highlight that their use is entirely voluntary and outline a number of exceptions that justify departure from the formula, such as marital debts, prior support obligations, disability and unequal property division.

Although reminiscent of the formulaic approach adopted by the largely unpopular Child Support Agency, the Canadian experience suggests that the guidelines may yet prove that formulas can indeed work for families.

If you need legal advice on divorce proceedings we can put you in touch with an expert solicitor. Call us now on 0800 1777 162.
Call
0800 1777 162
or fill in the form
Our trained advisor contacts you
Your chosen specialist solicitor calls you
Quick enquiry form
Area of law:
Name:
Town/City:
Email:
Phone:
What our clients say about us
Your assistance was extremely helpful. Particularly to someone who in 40 years of business has never experienced this sort of issue.
TD, commercial litigation, Galashiels, Apr 15
It is difficult to express the value Contact Law has to someone like me who had very little understanding of the law and how to proceed forward with my case. Thank you for the service you provided.
AE, defamation law, Worthing, Apr 15
"Thank you for the efficient service I received. I was contacted by your solicitor on the same day as my request. Your quick response to my situation made me feel secure"
AN, employment law, London, Apr 15
"Your service was excellent, very fast and informative. I never got the impression of being pressurised at all. The solicitor you recommended was also excellent – very knowledgeable and supportive."
JHD, Motoring law, Liverpool, Apr 15
"We will be changing our solicitor to the one you recommended. Your service is brilliant, I am only sorry we did not use you previously. Thank you again!"
KB, property law, Mar 15
"We used the solicitor as recommended, the service we have received has been both prompt and efficient. We would have no hesitation in using your organisation in the future."
BS, employment law, Mar 15
"Oustanding service! So friendly and helpful from the offset, and you went out of your way to make sure everything ran smoothly and that I was happy."
KB, employment law, London, Feb 15
"I am extremely impressed with your efficiency and dedication to my case. You have been a wonderful help and I will be recommending you to my friends. Thanks again, keep up the hard work!"
DMC, family law, London, Feb 15
"Very impressed with the speed of service and the quality advice given. What may seem like a trivial incident to some people was deeply upsetting for me and you made a real difference."
Defamation law, Scotland, Feb 15
"Even though you must deal with hundreds of these queries, your understanding, caring and the promptness with which you have dealt with my case is very reassuring."
Employment Law, London, Jan 15

We use cookies on the Contact Law site to help us improve it.

If you would like to allow our cookies, please click 'Continue' or carry on browsing. For more information on cookies and how to change your settings, click 'More info'.